Podiatrist Walking Clinic Toronto

Better Regulations: Seed regulation to Be reviewed

The current body of European seed laws forfaitaire up of 12 basic guidelines

• Council Directive 66 / 401/EEC of 14 June 1966 On The marketing of fodder plant seed
• Council Directive 66/402/EEC
  of 14 June 1966 On The marketing of cereal seed
• Council Directive 2002/53/EC of 13 June 2002 on the common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species
• Council Directive 2002/54/EC of 13 June 2002 on the marketing of beet seed
• Council Directive 2002/55/EC of 13 June 2002 on the marketing of vegetable seed
• Council Directive 2002/56/EC of 13 June 2002 on the marketing of seed potatoes

• Council Directive 2002/57/EC of 13 June 2002 on the marketing of seed of oil and fibre plants
• Council Directive 68/193/EC of 9 April 1968 on the marketing of material for the vegetative propagation of the vine
• Council Directive 1998/56/EC of 20 July 1998 on the marketing of propagating material of ornamental plants
• Council Directive 92/33/EEC of 28 April 1992 on the marketing of vegetable propagating and planting material, other than seed
• Council Directive 92/34/EEC of 28 April 1992 on the marketing of fruit plant propagating material and fruit plants intended for fruit production
• Council Directive 1999/105/EC of 22 December 1999 on the marketing of forest reproductive material Many of these date back to the sixties and seventies. As the balance of priorities has changed over the years, with elements such as food safety, traceability, new technologies and environmental aspects becoming more prominent, plus the expansion of the EU to now span 27 Member States, newer legal instruments may be more appropriate to regulate the marketing of S&PM to the benefit of both users and suppliers.

The Commission has therefore decided to review the legislation (the acquis) on the marketing of seeds and plant propagating material, as part of its better regulation initiative.

The first step of this review process consists of an evaluation of the current acquis. This should provide documented answers on the strengths and weaknesses of the current system for achieving the set objectives, or highlight the need to set new objectives in order to respond to new and anticipated challenges.

An equally important aim is to explore the possibilities for simplification and a reduction of administrative burdens on both public authorities and private sector stakeholders.

The evaluation will be carried out by external consultants (the FCEC consortium), assisted by a Steering Group composed of a balanced mix of experts from a number of Member States and from the Commission's services.

The task of the Steering Group is to assist in drafting the terms of reference and the questionnaire, and to ensure the quality of the final report.

On the basis of the recommendations to be contained in the final report, the Commission will then draft an action plan, laying out a programme for putting into practice any suggested reforms.

The FCEC launched a survey on 18 February 2008 to collect the views of stakeholders regarding the current Community acquis on the marketing of seeds and propagating material and to gather suggestions for the future. The deadline for returning the survey questionnaire is 11 April 2008.

The survey questionnaire is available in Word format and online .

Instructions have been drawn up to help you to fill in the online questionnaire. But before doing so, we strongly advise you to print the document in Word format, study the various questions, select those that are relevant to your organisation and prepare your answers. Please do not fill in the questionnaire directly online. If you prefer to fill in the Word version of the questionnaire instead of the online version of it, please feel free to do so and then return it by e-mail to lvn@bvdmc.com .

In order to ensure transparency of the process and to keep everyone informed of developments, validated information will be added to this site as the evaluation exercise progresses.
Click on the following links to find more information of the steps taken so far.
assessment in a nutshell
Agreed Terms of Reference for the Evaluation
Accepted offer From The CCF
Introduction letter

Difference Between Stripper Prostitute And Escort

Law and old varieties: the case Kokopelli

The condemnation of the Association Kokopelli

The Association Kokopelli was sentenced before the Regional Court in Nancy in December 2007 in the lawsuit filed by the company and Baumal before the Criminal Chamber of the Supreme Court in January 2008 in the case against the GNIS (of inter- seeds) and FNPSP (National Federation of Producers of vegetable seeds).

The reaction of the Secretary of State for Ecology

According AFP, Wednesday, January 6, 2008, Nathalie Kosciusko-Morizet, Secretary of State for Ecology, said that an amendment will be proposed as part of Grenelle law to authorize the marketing of old varieties. The reaction

GNIS

The GNIS has reacted very quickly with a press release on its site to a tune.

It is for us here to provide the necessary details.

Catalog created at the request of breeders

First, it is said in the statement that the Official Catalogue of Varieties "was created by the state in 1932 at the request of farmers." You should know that his creation was requested by the seed primarily because of the unfair competition which was detrimental to market new varieties selected. All historical references indicate (1). It is only very recently that the GNIS said in its press releases or news articles that would have been at the request of farmers.

Farmers have not been applicants for such regulation. And home gardeners even less.

The old varieties should be registered until 1960

Also be aware that this Catalogue, created in 1932, was initially optional. It was not obligatory to register a variety in order to commercialize it. It is since 1949 that all new varieties are required to be registered. From 1960 any variety - new or not (see old) - must be added to the catalog. But from the moment of the listing requirements make it almost impossible to catalog entry or remaining in the Catalogue of old varieties.

The purpose of seed regulations: governing the marketing of seed sold to farmers, not those sold to fans

Added to this is that all this regulation was put in place to govern the marketing of seed to farmers professionals. There was never a question of regulating the varieties sold to amateurs. But as to the years, especially when the market varieties of seeds sold to fans has become a lucrative market (amateur gardening is a sector that has experienced strong growth since the 1990s), it was felt, France, the regulation also applied seed to seed now sold to amateurs. Because the regulations did not specifically limited its scope to only seeds sold to farmers professionals, it has been applied to the seed sold to amateurs, although perfectly inadequate.

The wrong solution: the register amateur

The inability to include many old varieties has led to the opening of a registry for old varieties sold only to home gardeners in 1997. This was to control the market, while simplifying the rules. But impose a system of prior authorization for placing on the market for this type of sale is disproportionate and unjustified. Seed regulation was justified by problems of quality of seeds sold to farmers. But what concerns small quantities of seed sold to amateurs, such a scheme is not justified and raises the question of its legality under free trade.

Moreover, the cost of registration is important for sales of small quantities. Although GNIS say that registration is free of old varieties, it is not official. The registration fee schedule 2007, reflects: each entry is officially $ 249, 63 € (Source: All prices are quoted in a document online GEVES , testing organization for inclusion in the Catalogue). (The link to the 2007 rates no longer working, we add that to the 2008 rates: click here , listings of old varieties are now over 250 €).

The debate about the conservation of biodiversity is, in turn, a pool of arguments that drowns the debate. Both sides claimed to be the protector of biodiversity. Everyone contributes in its own way. The GNIS

, a representative "mandatory"

Regarding indications about the GNIS in the late release, he said represent "all the professionals of the seed sector. It is important to understand that current regulations require all professionals to register with the GNIS and, where applicable, comply with specific conditions for obtaining a business card. Without it, these actors can not legally practice their profession. That's because it's mandatory that GNIS represents "the entire industry." If the players had a choice, it would probably not the case.

figures, while a debate

Finally, on the impressive figure of 32,000 varieties: it actually represents the number of varieties listed in the Common Catalogue managed at EU level by the European Commission. It is by no means the number of varieties registered in the French Catalogue (6500 by GNIS), much less the number of varieties actually available to buy in France. Indeed, it is not because a variety is the official catalog it is actually sold. The figure for the number of varieties actually marketed must be much lower, but there are no official figures are given, perhaps because it would be much less flattering.

Much remains to say about this surprisingly complex and poorly understood. This is the purpose of my thesis, I am just finishing "The seed and the right".


(1) In this sense, Emile Schribaux (1923), Pierre Jonard (1951), GNIS pamphlets before 2000, for example GNIS, Seeds "certified" Cereal: The Treasure Within, GNIS No. 701, April 1970.

Methed Of Masterbutation

City Council Meeting Friday, February 8 on the PLU

City Council will meet Friday, February 8 at 7:15 p.m., Council Chambers in City Hall of 'Elincourt Sainte Marguerite.
The PLU (Plan Local d'Urbanisme), here is not only a planning regulation is also a village project. For the future
Elincourt and communicate the objectives of the municipality through this project, part of future developments, note that meeting.
Sincerely,

BERTRAND Alain